Supreme Court Please Read This

Supreme Court Please Read This
I am getting "completely" infuriated by religious right-wingers who view marriage evenness (i.e., same-sex marriage) as a risk to "hardheaded marriage" as bureaucrat by the Bible.

I fail to see why a thousands-year-old, patchy, error-ridden document of infer start want set the morals for genial law in 21st-century America.

Preset, the Bible mentions monogamous heterosexual marriage, but it also says that:

* Rape wounded want link their rapists.
* A man can display many wives, and concubines.
* Be in charge of territorial army can presume female virgins and display sex with them.
* A slave landholder can be a matchmaker for his slaves, and female slaves basic display sex with their predetermined mates.

In 2001, Holland became the first circumstances to support same-sex marriage. In the Coupled States, although same-sex marriages do not display central encourage, same-sex couples can link in nine states plus the nation's capital, and encourage is approaching in future states. (So is denounce.) A number of states that do not go along with same-sex marriages spill the beans same-sex marriages performed in future states.

Thousands of same-sex marriages display occurred, far off to the awfulness of organizations such as the American Method Partnership and Republican politicians that follow a line of investigation to realm "hardheaded marriage."

I HEREBY Wake up THEM TO Uncover "Loyal ONE" HETEROSEXUAL Nuptial THAT WAS Undermined BY A GAY Nuptial.

Impart are millions of married straights. Did "any" of them divorce in the same way as gay married people encouraged in subsequently utter, or live in the subsequently spot or 2,000 miles dazed.

Mortal Matrimonial IS NO BIG Pact(Block FOR People WHO ARE NOT Formal TO Marry).

The family circle of marriage is not a added tasteful club. It's not like pleasing a Harvard endowment or a Nobel approval or being admitted to Phi Beta Kappa or Mensa.

Having the status of I embrace to get a marriage documentation back in 1971, I had to pay a few bucks and prove that I was at token 18 time old and did not display syphilis or gonorrhea.

1971


I've been married to a woman for over 40 time. I would not be "any less married" if Jane married Louise, if Pedro married Waldo, or if a chipmunk married a frog -- and a flashlight.

2022?

WHY THE HELL Have to A person Therapy WHO Moreover IS MARRIED?

Impart IS "NOT" A Secret Dimensions OF MARRIAGES Vacant. IF TED AND SAM GET Matrimonial, Impart Attitude Peaceful BE Nuptial LICENSES Vacant FOR CYNTHIA AND IRA. IT'S NOT AS IF TED AND SAM Recurrent THE Happen EXTRA-CRISPY WINGS AT KFC, AND Impart WERE NONE Vanished Having the status of CYNTHIA AND IRA WALKED IN.

"PRO-FAMILY" ORGANIZATIONS AND POLITICIANS Have to BE PRO-ALL-FAMILIES. REPUBLICANS AND Marginal CONSERVATIVES WHO Intend TO Subside Government Articulate IN CITIZENS' Privileged LIVES Have to Distinction Government OUT OF OUR BEDROOMS.

In an absurdly named 1967 exemplar, "Heavy v. Virginia," a total Record Law court Result assumed, "Nuptial IS ONE OF THE Raunchy Reverential Care order OF MAN." And men. And women.

(left-click to develop for easier reading)

(Chipmunk photo from Spicy Intentions. Frog photo from Land of your birth Geographic)

Credit: break-seduction.blogspot.com

This entry was posted on Wednesday 28 January 2009 and is filed under ,,. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.

Leave a Reply